Ta'dib-Based Deep Learning

A Dialogue Between Syed MuhammadNaquib al-Attas and Meaningful LearningTheory for Indonesian Education

Authors

  • Ahmad Irfan University of Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Indonesia Author
  • Mujiono Mujiono Institute of Pembina Rohani Islam Jakarta (IPRIJA), Indonesia Author

Keywords:

adab; Al-Attas, deep learning, Indonesian education, meaningful learning, ta'dib

Abstract

Purpose—This conceptual article reconstructs a ta'dib-based account of deep learning by establishing a dialogue between Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas's philosophy of Islamic education and Western meaningful learning theory (David Ausubel and Joseph Novak). It addresses a gap in Indonesia's current Pembelajaran Mendalam agenda, whose policy vocabulary lacks an explicit account of why knowledge should be learned, how it should be ordered, and what conduct should follow from it.

Design/methods— The article employs an integrative literature review, analyzing foundational philosophical works, peer-reviewed studies on al-Attas and meaningful learning, Indonesian policy documents, and recent scholarship on digital and generative-AI-mediated education.

Findings— The analysis reveals a real but limited convergence: both traditions reject rote accumulation and require learners to connect new knowledge with an already meaningful structure. However, their difference is equally significant. Meaningful learning primarily explains cognitive integration and conceptual change, whereas ta'dib supplies an ontological, ethical, and teleological grammar that judges the proper place, source, purpose, and use of knowledge. The article therefore proposes that ta'dib should function as the normative orientation for objectives, source evaluation, dialogue, application, reflection, and assessment—not reduced to etiquette or a moral appendix. In Indonesia's digital environment, this reconstruction supports a form of deep learning where technological fluency, conceptual understanding, and learner agency are held accountable to intellectual humility, verification, justice, and responsibility.

References

Ahmad, A. (2021). Konsep ta'dib Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas dan implikasinya dalam pendidikan Islam. AN NUR: Jurnal Studi Islam, 13(1), 32–50. https://doi.org/10.37252/an-nur.v13i1.98

Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1980). The concept of education in Islam: A framework for an Islamic philosophy of education. Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia (ABIM).

Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1993). Islam and secularism. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC).

Ausubel, D. P. (1962). A subsumption theory of meaningful verbal learning and retention. The Journal of General Psychology, 66, 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1962.9711837

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679050

Bryce, T. G. K., & Blown, E. J. (2024). Ausubel's meaningful learning re-visited. Current Psychology, 43(5), 4579–4598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04440-4

Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823

Dolata, M., Katsiuba, D., Wellnhammer, N., & Schwabe, G. (2023). Learning with digital agents: An analysis based on activity theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 40(1), 56–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2023.2172775

Fawns, T. (2022). An entangled pedagogy: Looking beyond the pedagogy–technology dichotomy. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(3), 711–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00302-7

Hidayatullah, E. A., & Arif, S. (2022). Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas' exposition on the concept of ethics. Afkar, 24(1), 409–446. https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol24no1.12

In'ami, M., Bambang, & Wekke, I. S. (2025). Contextualising adab in Islamic education from the perspective of Al-Attas. Journal of Al-Tamaddun, 20(1), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.22452/JAT.vol20no1.11

Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2025). Naskah akademik pembelajaran mendalam: Menuju pendidikan bermutu untuk semua. Pusat Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran, Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan.

Mu'ti, A. (2023). Pluralistic Islamic religious education: A vision for Indonesia. The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 21(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2023.2200280

Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548–571. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10032

Novak, J. D. (2010). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203862001

Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422

Rahmawati, Y., Mu'ti, A., Suyanto, S., & Herianingtyas, N. L. R. (2025). Pembelajaran mendalam: Transformasi pembelajaran menuju pendidikan bermutu. Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.24832/jpkp.v18i1.1281

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693

Yunita, I., Saidah, A., & Fahmi, M. (2025). The imperative of integrating knowledge and adab in reconstructing Islamic education in the digital era: A study of Al-Attas's thought. J-PAI: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 11(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.18860/jpai.v11i2.32660

Zapata, G. C., Saini, A. K., Tzirides, A. O., Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2024). The role of AI feedback in university students' learning experiences: An exploration grounded in activity theory. Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, 18(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-9795/CGP/v18i02/1-30

Zou, Y., Kuek, F., Feng, W., & Cheng, X. (2025). Digital learning in the 21st century: Trends, challenges, and innovations in technology integration. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1562391. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1562391

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ta’dib-Based Deep Learning: A Dialogue Between Syed MuhammadNaquib al-Attas and Meaningful LearningTheory for Indonesian Education. (2026). RASAFAT: Research and Studies on Academic Frameworks and Thought, 2(1), 34-52. https://ejournal.yahdifa.org/index.php/rasafat/article/view/49